Save this provider to compare the same published fields across up to four providers of the same care type.
Open your comparisonNo state star-rating reference is shown when the rating is missing or fewer than five comparable providers have a published value.
How to compare records without mistaking missing data for good performance →
7 out of 10
CMS builds this single score out of ten separate indicators drawn from claims. A provider earns a point for each indicator where it is not an outlier against national thresholds. This one scores mid-range.
| Indicator | This provider | Read as |
|---|---|---|
| Visits near death | 86.7% | higher is better |
| Gaps in nursing visits | 82.2% | lower is better |
| Early live discharges | 2.9% | lower is better |
| Late live discharges | 50.0% | lower is better |
| Burdensome transitions, Type 1 | 14.7% | lower is better |
| Burdensome transitions, Type 2 | 5.9% | lower is better |
| Skilled nursing minutes on weekends | 5.9% | higher is better |
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care days | 7.50 min | higher is better |
| CHC/GIP provided | 0.0% | higher is better |
| Per-beneficiary spending | $24,273 | context, not a quality score |
Why live discharges matter. Hospice is for people expected to die within six months. A patient leaving hospice alive is sometimes the right outcome — they got better, or chose to resume curative treatment. But an unusually high rate can also indicate patients were enrolled who did not qualify, or were discharged when their care became expensive. CMS publishes early and late live-discharge rates for exactly this reason. Treat a high number as a question to ask, not a verdict.
| Survey question | Families answering "always" / top box | |
|---|---|---|
| Rated this hospice 9 or 10 out of 10 | 62.0% | |
| Would definitely recommend | 73.0% | |
| Family member treated with respect | 86.0% | |
| Got the emotional and spiritual support they wanted | 85.0% |
CAHPS Hospice Survey, completed by caregivers after the patient's death. Providers with too few responses are not scored.
Average daily census: 40 patients.
Each row is a filed role, not a separate shareholding. The same person or organization may appear more than once. Do not add percentages across direct ownership, indirect ownership, officer and management roles. Management roles alone do not establish equity ownership.
| Owner | Role | Share | Associated since | CMS type flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANDREW'S SAINTS, LLC | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 9.94% | 9/1/2019 | — |
| ECHOLS CAPITAL, LLC | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 12.42% | 4/10/2019 | — |
| ANTOINE PHAM | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 0% | 4/13/2022 | — |
| CURTIS OHLENDORF | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | 9/1/2019 | — |
| CURTIS OHLENDORF | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 0% | 9/1/2019 | — |
| LEWIS LITTLE | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | 4/10/2019 | — |
| LEWIS LITTLE | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 0% | 4/10/2019 | — |
| PATRICK HALE | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 12.42% | 4/10/2019 | — |
| THOMAS WILSON | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 55.28% | 4/10/2019 | — |
| THOMAS WILSON | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 0% | 8/30/2019 | — |
Source: CMS Hospice All Owners file, linked to this provider through its Medicare enrollment record. Medicare's Care Compare does not present ownership in this form.
Everything on this page is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (snapshot dates and measure periods vary by dataset) and, where shown, the CMS ownership and Medicare enrollment files. Star ratings and comparison categories are from CMS; explanatory notes provide context. If you believe a figure is wrong, email data@carerecords.org with the CCN and we verify against the official file within 5 business days.
How to cite this page: CareRecords, "Sonder Hospice — hospice records, Austin, TX." Compiled from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (downloaded CMS snapshots (measure periods vary) release), CCN 971572. https://carerecords.org/hospice/texas/sonder-hospice-austin/